1 . SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
++SOUNDBITE PARTIALLY COVERED++
"This bill is aiming to repeal major parts of the affordable care act and replace it with a more conservative approach. The bill is looking to reduce the amount the federal government spends on health care through the Medicaid program and through tax credits provided to low and middle income people. The result of the reduced federal spending under this bill is likely to mean more people are uninsured."
2. Man walks into hospital entrance
3. H for hospital street sign
4. Emergency sign
5. Ambulance drives by
6 . SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"There are major changes to the insurance market under this bill. Repealing the individual mandate that encourages healthy people to buy insurance but still leaving in place some of the protections in the affordable care act like guaranteed coverage of people with pre-existing conditions."
7 . SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"Insurers would be allowed to charge older people five times what they charge younger people and there would be reduced regulation on the kind of coverage insurance have to provide."
8 . SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"Low income people including 20 million people who have gotten covered under the affordable care act would be particularly hard under this bill. Low income people would get substantially less help in buying insurance, and reduced funding under the Medicare program would make it difficult for states to provide the kind of benefits they do today."
9 . SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"The risk in eliminating the individual mandate is that insurers would still have to provide coverage to people with pre-existing conditions but may not get enough healthy people to balance that out.
10. SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"There are a number of markets around the country that have been fragile under the affordable care act but it's not at all clear that this bill will actually stabilize those markets and encourage more insurers to participate."
11. SOUNDBITE (English) Larry Levitt, Kaiser Family Foundation, health policy analyst
"It's important to remember that this is just the beginning of this debate not the end. This bill has got to pass the house, then it's got to go to the Senate where there are some where there are some very contentious issues ahead."
House Republicans on Monday released their long-awaited plan for unraveling former President Barack Obama's health care law, a package that would scale back the government's role in health care and likely leave more Americans uninsured.
House committees planned to begin voting on the 123-page legislation Wednesday, launching what could be the year's defining battle in Congress and capping a seven-year Republican effort to repeal the 2010 law. Though GOP leaders expect their measure to win the backing of the Trump administration, divisions remain and GOP success is by no means ensured.
The plan would repeal the statute's unpopular fines on people who don't carry health insurance. It would replace income-based subsidies the law provides to help millions of Americans pay premiums with age-based tax credits that may be less generous to people with low incomes. Those payments would phase out for higher-earning people.
The bill would continue Obama's expansion of Medicaid to additional low-earning Americans until 2020. After that, states adding Medicaid recipients would no longer receive the additional federal funds the statute has provided.
More significantly, Republicans would overhaul the federal-state Medicaid program, changing its open-ended federal financing to a limit based on enrollment and costs in each state.
In perhaps their riskiest political gamble, the plan is expected to cover fewer than the 20 million people insured under Obama's overhaul, including many residents of states carried by President Donald Trump in November's election.
Republicans said they don't have official estimates on those figures yet. But aides from both parties and nonpartisan analysts have said they expect coverage numbers to be lower.
House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said the bill would "drive down costs, encourage competition, and give every American access to quality, affordable health insurance." He added, "This unified Republican government will deliver relief and peace of mind to the millions of Americans suffering under Obamacare."
But besides solid opposition from Democrats, there were signals galore that Republican leaders faced problems within their own party, including from conservatives complaining that the measure isn't aggressive enough in repealing parts of Obama's law.
"It still looks like Obamacare-lite to me," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., among three Senate conservatives who have criticized the emerging GOP bill. "It's going to have to be better."
The Republican tax credits — ranging from $2,000 to $14,000 for families — would be refundable, meaning even people with no tax liability would receive the payments. Conservatives have objected that that feature creates a new entitlement program the government cannot afford.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, wouldn't rule out changes in the measure by his chamber, where significant numbers of moderate Republicans have expressed concerns that the measure could leave too many voters without coverage.
"The House has the right to come up with what it wants to and present it to the Senate by passing it. And we have a right to look it over and see if we like it or don't," Hatch told reporters.
Underscoring those worries, four GOP senators released a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., shortly before the bill was unveiled.
They complained that an earlier, similar draft of the measure "does not provide stability and certainty for individuals and families in Medicaid expansion programs or the necessary flexibility for states." Signing the letter were Sens. Rob Portman of Ohio, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, Cory Gardner of Colorado and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia opted to expand Medicaid coverage under the law and accept beefed-up federal spending for the program. Around half those states have GOP governors, who are largely reluctant to see that spending curtailed.
In another feature that could alienate moderate Republicans, the measure would block for one year federal payments to Planned Parenthood, the women's health organization long opposed by many in the party because it provides abortions. It also forbids people receiving tax credits to help pay premiums to buy coverage under a plan that provides abortions.
Republicans said they'd not yet received official cost estimates on the overall bill from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. That office's projections on the bill's price tag and the number of people the measure would cover could be key in winning over recalcitrant Republicans, or making them even harder to win over.
A series of tax increases on higher-earning people, the insurance industry and others used to finance the Obama overhaul's coverage expansion would be repealed as of 2018.
In a last-minute change to satisfy conservative lawmakers, business and unions, Republicans dropped a plan pushed by Ryan to impose a first-ever tax on the most generous employer-provided health plans.
Popular consumer protections in the Obama law would be retained, such as insurance safeguards for people with pre-existing medical problems, and parents' ability to keep young adult children on their insurance until age 26.