President Donald Trump's nominee for attorney general says he doesn't believe special counsel Robert Mueller (MUHL'-ur) "would be involved in a witch hunt."

Barr made the comment Tuesday at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Trump has repeatedly decried the special counsel's investigation as a "witch hunt" and has suggested he is being targeted by the Justice Department.

Mueller is investigating potential ties between Russia and the 2016 Trump campaign.

Barr also says it would be an "abuse of power" for Trump to intervene in an investigation he "has a stake in."

William Barr said Tuesday at his confirmation hearing he believes such an action would be a breach of the president's constitutional duties and could violate federal law depending upon the circumstances.

Barr was responding to questions from California Sen. Dianne Feinstein (FYN'-styn), the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, in light of a memo he wrote criticizing special counsel Robert Mueller's obstruction-of-justice investigation.

Barr has said the memo was intended to be narrowly focused on one of Mueller's reported interpretations of obstruction. Barr also says his memo was based solely on public reporting and not any confidential information.

POOL

Washington - 15 January 2018

1. Wide of hearing

2. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina:

"Are you familiar with the January 11th New York Times article about FBI open inquiry into whether Trump was secretly working on behalf of Russians."

3. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee (off camera):

"Yes Mr. Chairman."

4. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina:

"Would you promise me and this committee to look into this and tell us whether or not, in the appropriate way, a counterintelligence investigation was opened up by somebody at the FBI slash Department of Justice against President Trump."

5. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Yes, Mr. Chairman. I think there were a number of investigations as I understand it going on in the department."

6.  SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"You ever heard of such a thing in all the time you've been associated with the Department of Justice."

7. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I have never heard of that."

8. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina:

"Are there rules about how you can do counterintelligence investigations?"

9. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I believe there are Mr. Chairman."

10. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"So if you want to open up one against the president. are there any checks and balances?"

11. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Not outside the FBI."

12. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"OK well we need to look at that."

13. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina:

"Mueller. You say you've known Mueller a long time. Would you say you have a close relationship with Mr. Mueller?"

14. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I would say we were good friends."

15. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"Would you say that you understand him to be a fair minded person?."

16. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Absolutely."

17. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"Do you trust him to be fair to the president and the country as a whole?"

18. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Yes."

19. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina (off camera):

"When his report comes to you, will you share with us as much as possible?"

20. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Consistent with the regulations and the law, yes."

21. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen Lindsey Graham, (R) South Carolina:

"Do you believe Mr. Mueller would be involved in a witch hunt against anybody?"

22. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I don't I don't believe Mr. Mueller would would be involved in a witch hunt."

23. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Will you commit to no interference with the scope of the special counsel's investigation?"

24. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I will--the scope of the special counsel's investigation is set by his charter and by the regulations and I will ensure that those are maintained."

25. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California (off camera):

"Will you commit to providing Mr. Muller with the resources, funds and time needed to complete his investigation?"

26. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Yes."

27. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California (off camera):

"Will you commit to ensuring that Special Counsel Mueller is not terminated without good cause, consistent with department regulations?"

28. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Absolutely."

29. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California (off camera):

"If special counsel Mueller makes any request, for instance, about the scope of his investigation or resources for his investigation will you commit to notifying Congress if you deny that request?"

30. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"I think the regulations require notification of Congress if there's a disagreement."

31. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Will you commit to making any report Mueller produces at the conclusion of his investigation available to Congress and to the public?"

32. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"As I said in my statement I am going to make as much information available as I can, consistent with the rules and regulations that are part of the special counsel regulations."

33. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California (off camera):

"Will you commit to making any report on the obstruction of justice public?"

34. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"That's the same answer."

35. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Your 2018 memo, in it, you stated and I quote 'the framers plan contemplates that the president's law enforcement powers extend to all matters including those in which he had a personal stake' end quote. Please explain what you base this conclusion on."

36. SOUNDBITE (English) William Barr, Attorney General Nominee:

"Here's the Department of Justice right here and within the Department of Justice, enforcement decisions are being made. The president's over here. And I think of it as there are two categories of potential communications. One would be on a case that the president wants to communicate about that he has no personal interest in no political interest in. Let's say the president is concerned about Chinese stealing trade secrets and say I want you to go after this company that's being, you know, that may be stealing trade secrets. That's perfectly appropriate for him to do, to communicate that, but whether it's bona fide or not, as I said in my statement, the Department of Justice's obligation and the attorney general's obligation is not to take any action unless we reach, we, the Department of Justice and the attorney general, reach their own, independent conclusion that it is justified under the law. And, regardless of the instruction and that's my quote that everyone is saying you know siccing you know it's OK for the president to direct things. All I said was it's not per se improper for the president to call on the department for doing something, especially if he has no personal or political interest in it. The other category of cases and let's pick a you know an easy bad example would be if a member of the president's family or a business associate or something was under investigation and he tries to intervene. He--he's the chief law enforcement officer and you could say well he has the power. But that would be a breach of his obligation under the Constitution to faithfully execute the laws. So in my opinion if he attempts, if a president attempts to intervene in a matter that he has a stake in to try to protect himself that should first be looked at as a breach of his constitutional duties whether it also violates a statute depending on what statute comes into play and what all the facts are."

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh says a 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a constitutional right to an abortion is an "important precedent" that has "been reaffirmed many times."

Kavanaugh was asked about the Roe v. Wade ruling by Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California. He said the decision has "been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years." And he noted that a 1992 decision of the court called Planned Parenthood v. Casey didn't just reaffirm Roe v. Wade in passing. He said that decision becomes "precedent on precedent."

Kavanaugh compared the Roe decision to another case, Miranda v. Arizona, which requires law enforcement to tell suspects their rights. Kavanaugh noted that former Chief Justice William Rehnquist had been a critic of the Miranda decision but later upheld it as precedent.

Kavanaugh also refused to say whether a president can be forced to testify in a criminal case, calling it a hypothetical.

The topic is front-and-center at Kavanaugh's hearing because the man who nominated him, President Donald Trump, could face a subpoena in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

Sen. Feinstein asked Kavanaugh whether he thinks a sitting president can "be required to respond to a subpoena."

Kavanaugh responded: "I can't give you an answer on that hypothetical question."

The Supreme Court has never ruled on a presidential subpoena.

POOL

Washington - 5 September 2018

1. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"I think knowing going into it how you make a judgment on these issues is really important to our vote as whether to support you are not, because I don't want to go back to those death tolls in this country. And I truly believe that women should be able to control their own reproductive systems, within, obviously, some concern for a viable fetus."

2. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I understand the importance of the issue. I understand the importance that people attach to the Roe v. Wade decision, to the Planned Parenthood versus Casey decision. I don't live in a bubble. I understand - I live in the real world. I understand the importance of the issue."

3. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Have your views about whether Roe is settled precedent changed since you were in the Bush White House?"

4. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I will tell you what my view right now is - which is it's important precedent of the Supreme Court that's been reaffirmed many times, but then Planned - and this is the point I want to make that I think is important - Planned Parenthood vs. Casey reaffirmed Roe and did so by considering the stare decisis factors. So Casey now becomes a precedent on precedent."

5. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"What would you say your position today is on a woman's right to choose?"

6. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"As a judge... it is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. By 'it,' I mean Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood vs. Casey have been reaffirmed many times. Casey is precedent on precedent, which itself is an important factor to remember and I understand the significance of the issue - the jurisprudential issue. And I understand the significance as best I can - I always try and I do hear - of the real world effects of that decision, as I tried to do of all the decisions of my court and of the Supreme Court."

7. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"You have said that the Nixon case might have been wrongly decided. Was US v. Nixon wrongly decided?"

8. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"That quote is not in context and is a misunderstanding of my position that's up there. I have repeatedly called US v. Nixon one of the four greatest moments in Supreme Court history."

9. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Was it rightly decided?"

10. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I have said that - I have said, yes, that a court's holding, that a criminal trial subpoena to a president in the context of the... special counsel's regulations in that case... for information - a criminal trial subpoena for information under the specific regulations in that case - I have said that holding is one of the four greatest moments in Supreme Court history."

11. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Can a sitting president be required to respond to a subpoena?"

12. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"So that's a hypothetical question about what would be an elaboration or a difference forum US v. Nixon's precise holding. And I think going with the Justice Ginsburg principle, which is really not the Justice Ginsburg alone principle - it's everyone's principle on the current Supreme Court - and as a matter of the canons of judicial independence, I can't give you an answer on that hypothetical question."

Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh says a 1973 Supreme Court decision that established a constitutional right to an abortion is an "important precedent" that has "been reaffirmed many times."

Kavanaugh was asked about the Roe v. Wade ruling by Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California. He said the decision has "been reaffirmed many times over the past 45 years." And he noted that a 1992 decision of the court called Planned Parenthood v. Casey didn't just reaffirm Roe v. Wade in passing. He said that decision becomes "precedent on precedent."

Kavanaugh compared the Roe decision to another case, Miranda v. Arizona, which requires law enforcement to tell suspects their rights. Kavanaugh noted that former Chief Justice William Rehnquist had been a critic of the Miranda decision but later upheld it as precedent.

Kavanaugh also refused to say whether a president can be forced to testify in a criminal case, calling it a hypothetical.

The topic is front-and-center at Kavanaugh's hearing because the man who nominated him, President Donald Trump, could face a subpoena in special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation.

Sen. Feinstein asked Kavanaugh whether he thinks a sitting president can "be required to respond to a subpoena."

Kavanaugh responded: "I can't give you an answer on that hypothetical question."

The Supreme Court has never ruled on a presidential subpoena.

POOL

Washington - 5 September 2018

1. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"I think knowing going into it how you make a judgment on these issues is really important to our vote as whether to support you are not, because I don't want to go back to those death tolls in this country. And I truly believe that women should be able to control their own reproductive systems, within, obviously, some concern for a viable fetus."

2. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I understand the importance of the issue. I understand the importance that people attach to the Roe v. Wade decision, to the Planned Parenthood versus Casey decision. I don't live in a bubble. I understand - I live in the real world. I understand the importance of the issue."

3. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Have your views about whether Roe is settled precedent changed since you were in the Bush White House?"

4. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I will tell you what my view right now is - which is it's important precedent of the Supreme Court that's been reaffirmed many times, but then Planned - and this is the point I want to make that I think is important - Planned Parenthood vs. Casey reaffirmed Roe and did so by considering the stare decisis factors. So Casey now becomes a precedent on precedent."

5. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"What would you say your position today is on a woman's right to choose?"

6. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"As a judge... it is an important precedent of the Supreme Court. By 'it,' I mean Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood vs. Casey have been reaffirmed many times. Casey is precedent on precedent, which itself is an important factor to remember and I understand the significance of the issue - the jurisprudential issue. And I understand the significance as best I can - I always try and I do hear - of the real world effects of that decision, as I tried to do of all the decisions of my court and of the Supreme Court."

7. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"You have said that the Nixon case might have been wrongly decided. Was US v. Nixon wrongly decided?"

8. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"That quote is not in context and is a misunderstanding of my position that's up there. I have repeatedly called US v. Nixon one of the four greatest moments in Supreme Court history."

9. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Was it rightly decided?"

10. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"I have said that - I have said, yes, that a court's holding, that a criminal trial subpoena to a president in the context of the... special counsel's regulations in that case... for information - a criminal trial subpoena for information under the specific regulations in that case - I have said that holding is one of the four greatest moments in Supreme Court history."

11. SOUNDBITE (English) Sen. Dianne Feinstein, (D) California:

"Can a sitting president be required to respond to a subpoena?"

12. SOUNDBITE (English) Brett Kavanaugh, Supreme Court nominee:

"So that's a hypothetical question about what would be an elaboration or a difference forum US v. Nixon's precise holding. And I think going with the Justice Ginsburg principle, which is really not the Justice Ginsburg alone principle - it's everyone's principle on the current Supreme Court - and as a matter of the canons of judicial independence, I can't give you an answer on that hypothetical question."